Skip to main content

Build a Repeatable User Access Review Process

User accounts are constantly changing. Employees join, change roles, work with contractors, receive elevated permissions, and eventually leave the organization.

Without a consistent review process, it's easy for excessive permissions, dormant accounts, and outdated access to accumulate over time, creating unnecessary security risk and making compliance reviews significantly more difficult.

Liongard helps MSPs build repeatable user access review processes by continuously discovering identities, monitoring account changes, and providing visibility into privileged access, account activity, MFA adoption, and identity lifecycle data.

Instead of manually reviewing user accounts across multiple systems, teams can establish a standardized process that improves security, supports compliance, and ensures access remains aligned with business needs.

This helps MSPs:

  • Identify dormant or inactive accounts

  • Review privileged access regularly

  • Validate MFA adoption

  • Detect unauthorized account changes

  • Simplify audit preparation

  • Standardize identity governance across clients

Why user access reviews matter

Access reviews shouldn't only happen before an audit.

Organizations constantly experience:

  • New employee onboarding

  • Employee departures

  • Role changes

  • Contractor access

  • Temporary elevated permissions

  • Service account creation

Without regular reviews, organizations often accumulate:

  • Dormant accounts

  • Excessive privileges

  • Shared accounts

  • Unused administrator accounts

  • Former employee access

  • Accounts missing MFA

These issues increase security risk and make incident response more difficult.

A repeatable review process helps ensure users have the right access—and only the access they need.

What to review

Liongard provides visibility into identities across supported platforms, helping teams evaluate:

User lifecycle

Review:

  • New accounts

  • Disabled accounts

  • Dormant users

  • Deleted users

  • Recently reactivated users

Privileged access

Identify:

  • Global Administrators

  • Domain Administrators

  • Local Administrators

  • Users with elevated permissions

Review whether elevated access is still required.

MFA adoption

Review:

  • Accounts without MFA

  • Privileged users missing MFA

  • Inconsistent MFA enforcement

These reviews often become high-priority remediation items.

Service & shared accounts

Validate:

  • Service account ownership

  • Shared administrative accounts

  • Legacy application accounts

  • Accounts no longer in use

Ensure each account has a documented business purpose.

Build a repeatable review process

Step 1 — Establish a review cadence

Recommended review frequency:

Environment

Review Frequency

Regulated or high-risk clients

Monthly

Standard SMB clients

Quarterly

Low-risk environments

Semi-annually

Step 2 — Review identity inventory

Use Liongard's Identity Inventory to identify:

  • New users

  • Dormant accounts

  • Privileged users

  • Accounts missing MFA

  • Unexpected account growth

Look for changes since the previous review.

Step 3 — Validate access

Ask questions such as:

  • Does this user still work here?

  • Does this account require elevated privileges?

  • Is MFA enabled?

  • Is this service account still required?

  • Is access appropriate for the user's role?

Step 4 — Remediate findings

Common remediation actions include:

  • Remove unnecessary administrator rights

  • Disable dormant accounts

  • Delete obsolete users

  • Enable MFA

  • Document service accounts

  • Update group memberships

Step 5 — Document review completion

Record:

  • Review date

  • Reviewer

  • Findings

  • Remediation actions

  • Outstanding exceptions

Maintaining consistent documentation supports future reviews and audit readiness.

Common operational workflows

Quarterly access reviews

Perform scheduled reviews of:

  • Privileged users

  • Dormant accounts

  • MFA coverage

  • Service accounts

Employee offboarding validation

Confirm:

  • Accounts disabled

  • Privileged access removed

  • Shared credentials updated

  • Group memberships cleaned up

Compliance support

Regular access reviews help support:

  • CIS Controls

  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework

  • SOC 2

  • HIPAA

  • Cyber insurance questionnaires

Security investigations

Following a security incident, review:

  • Recently created accounts

  • Permission changes

  • Dormant account activity

  • Administrative account usage

Best practices

  • Review privileged accounts separately from standard users

  • Prioritize dormant administrative accounts

  • Require MFA for all privileged identities

  • Document service account ownership

  • Schedule recurring access reviews

  • Use Change Detection to monitor unexpected permission changes

  • Integrate high-risk findings into Actionable Alerts

Operational outcomes

A repeatable user access review process helps MSPs:

  • Reduce identity-related security risks

  • Improve visibility into privileged access

  • Strengthen identity governance

  • Simplify compliance reviews

  • Improve audit readiness

  • Standardize customer security reviews

  • Reduce unauthorized access

  • Build more mature security operations

Did this answer your question?